Each student is required to read Unmasking Administrative Evil by Danny Balfour, Guy Adams, and Ashley Nickels and write a 6-8-page (typewritten, double-spaced, 12-point font – not including the title page, references, abstract and appendices) review of the book. This entails summarizing the book’s key concepts and critiquing the authors’ arguments. In constructing their reviews, students should also apply public administration concepts gleaned from the course readings, discussions, and scholarly literature in their critique whenever possible. A good book review at the graduate level, nonetheless, entails more than just rote summarization. Broadly speaking, it should address the following:
- What is the book’s main goal?
- What are the main/important points highlighted in the book?
- Discuss/evaluate the evidence utilized in making those points. Is the evidence convincing?
- Is the book well-written? Is it understandable? Critique the writing style.
- Who is the target audience?
More specifically, the book review should be structured as follows (See the Book Review Rubric in the “Files” section of Canvas for more detail on the grading criteria for this assignment.):
- Introduction (about 1-2 pages) – This section includes bibliographic information describing the authors, the title, when the book was written, who it was written for, whether it was well written/understandable, etc. The introduction will also seek to put the book into context. In that vein, you should include a brief overview of the book’s overall theme and purpose along with the purpose of your evaluation.
- Summarization (about 2 pages) – The summarization component will address the key points in each chapter or group of chapters. Paraphrasing is appropriate here. However,
Note: Full answer to this question is available after purchase.



Reviews
There are no reviews yet.