HUM 102 MODULE THREE SHORT ANSWER ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES AND RUBRIC

[Order] PDSA Project & PowerPoint Presentation

$ 78.84

PDSA Project & PowerPoint Presentation

Due Oct 12 by 11:59pm Points 100

Submitting a media recording or a file upload Available Aug 25 at 12am – Oct 12 at 11:59pm

PDSA Practice Improvement Plan PDSA Practice Improvement Plan The assignment will be divided into four phases.

The PDSA project will give students the experience to initiate and coordinate planned changes in a healthcare organization. This assignment aims to engage the student in identifying a clinical problem or process, undertaking a literature review, and implementing an evidence-based intervention to improve patient, nurse/staff, or clinical outcomes and/or processes.

Order Now
Category:
Order This Paper

PDSA Project & PowerPoint Presentation

Due Oct 12 by 11:59pm Points 100

Submitting a media recording or a file upload Available Aug 25 at 12am – Oct 12 at 11:59pm

PDSA Practice Improvement Plan PDSA Practice Improvement Plan The assignment will be divided into four phases.

The PDSA project will give students the experience to initiate and coordinate planned changes in a healthcare organization. This assignment aims to engage the student in identifying a clinical problem or process, undertaking a literature review, and implementing an evidence-based intervention to improve patient, nurse/staff, or clinical outcomes and/or processes.

Students will use the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (2020) Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Directions and Examples as a guideline for this assignment (Web link Available in Modules)

Part I: Plan

  1. Problem Identification

Problem Identification:

Students will identify a clinical issue or process by:

Reviewing clinical site’s electronic health records.

Please read details below.

Eliciting feedback from staff, patients, or family members.

Observing impact of current protocols on patient outcomes, delivery of care, and staff satisfaction.

Nurses can leverage Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to identify clinical issues and improve system processes in several impactful ways:

  1. Data Aggregation and Analysis: EHRs compile comprehensive patient data, allowing nurses to analyze trends and patterns. This can help identify common clinical issues, such as frequent infections or medication errors, and address them proactively
  2. Clinical Alerts and Reminders: EHRs can generate alerts for potential clinical issues, such as abnormal lab results or missed medications. These alerts help nurses intervene promptly, improving patient safety and care quality
  3. Support for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Decisions: EHRs provide decision support tools that assist nurses in making informed clinical These tools can suggest potential diagnoses or treatment options based on patient data, enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of care
  1. Improving Communication: EHRs facilitate better communication among healthcare team members by providing a centralized platform for patient This ensures that all team members are aware of the patient’s status and any clinical issues, leading to more coordinated and effective care
  2. Identifying Systemic Issues: By analyzing data from EHRs, nurses can identify systemic issues within the healthcare facility, such as workflow inefficiencies or resource Addressing these issues can lead to improved processes and better patient outcomes
  3. Quality Improvement Initiatives: EHRs enable the tracking of key performance indicators and outcomes. Nurses can use this data to participate in quality improvement initiatives, aiming to enhance care standards and patient satisfaction
  4. Documentation and Compliance: Accurate and thorough documentation in EHRs helps ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and standards. This not only improves patient care but also protects the healthcare facility from legal and financial risks

2.  Review of Literature

Review of literature:

What level of knowledge is out there to address the clinical problem or process you identified at your clinical site?

Currently, what evidence-based guidelines are published on the clinical problem or process?

The literature reviewed should consist of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, peer-reviewed studies, or clinical guidelines.

Expert opinion articles and clinical articles can be used as supportive literature for clinical issues with limited research.

Students will use the prompt function in Copilot to help them “review the literature” on the clinical problem or process you’ve identified.

Students will use their MDC credentials to log into Copilot

Copilot is a new AI platform being used at MDC that can be used to review the literature on a clinical problem or process.

To access Copilot, please click on the following weblink: https://copilot.microsoft.com/

 (https://copilot.microsoft.com/)

Once the webpage opens, simply use your MDC credentials to log in:  Username:

Password:

Here are some helpful tips for students to learn how to use effective prompts in Copilot:

  1. Be Clear and Specific: Clearly state what you need help Instead of saying “Tell me about history,” specify “Can you summarize the causes of World War II?”
  2. Use Keywords: Include important keywords related to your For example, “pain management in hospice patients” instead of just “pain management.”
  3. Ask Open-Ended Questions: Encourage detailed responses by asking open-ended questions. For instance, “What are the best practices for managing pain in hospice care?” instead of “Is pain management important?”
  4. Provide Context: Give some background information or context to help Copilot understand your needs For example, “I’m writing a paper on pain management for hospice patients and need recent research articles.”
  5. Be Patient and Iterative: If the first response isn’t exactly what you need, refine your prompt and ask For example, “Can you provide more recent articles?” or “Can you explain that in simpler terms?”
  6. Use Follow-Up Questions: Build on the information provided by asking follow-up questions. For example, “Can you explain more about the role of opioids in pain management?”
  7. Specify the Format: If you need information in a specific format, mention For example, “Can you list five recent journal articles on pain management?”
  8. Stay Polite and Respectful: Politeness goes a long way in ensuring a smooth For example, “Could you help me find information on…?” or “Thank you for your help!”

By following these tips, students can make the most out of their interactions with Copilot and get the information they need more efficiently. Do you have any specific questions or need further assistance?

In addition to using Copilot, students will also “review the literature” by going to the “MDC Resources” tab available on their Canvas’ Navigation Panel, then click on the weblink titled

“MDC’s Research Databases (i.e., Journals)” or simply click on this weblink: MDC’s Research Databases (i.e., Journals) (https://mdc.instructure.com/courses/131153/modules/items/12175272) Students will need to reference a minimum of five (5) research articles published by professional journals or organizations on their identified clinical problem or process.

Present a summary of your literature review in a table format using the following criteria:  1st column: Study (i.e., author(s))

2nd Column: Population  3rd Column: Intervention  4th Column: Comparison  5th Column: Outcomes

6th column: Results

7th Column: Level of Evidence

Please use “Level of Evidence” instead of Quality

Use Winona State University’s (WSU) Evidence Based Practice Toolkit: Levels of Evidence (Melynk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023) by clicking here: https://libguides.winona.edu/ebptoolkit/Levels-Evidence

 (https://libguides.winona.edu/ebptoolkit/Levels-Evidence)

 (https://libguides.winona.edu/ebptoolkit/Levels-Evidence) For each source, students will review WSU’s Levels of evidence and determine which level to assign to each source.

  1. I plan to: You will write a concise statement of what you plan to do in your PDSA project
  2. I hope this produces: Here you will put a measurement or outcome that you hope to achieve with your project
5.  PICO(T) Question (Must be the same PICOT question approved by Course Professor in Discussion #2)

Please see Discussion #2 Guidelines & Grading Rubric

The Process
  1. Steps to Execute: Write the steps you’re going to take in the PDSA cycle, the population you are working with, and the time limit

The population could be a patient, a problem, a population, a unit, a division, or an organization problem.

The population has to be greater than 10

The time limit that you will do this project.

The time is limited to the days you attend clinical

Time limit cannot start before you started you clinical hours or end after your last day

The PDSA project must be completed within your 48 in-person/on site clinical hours

Part II: Do
  1. After you have your plan, you will execute it or set it in

2.  What happened when you implemented your plan? What did you observe?

Here you will write down data (i.e., numbers) you gathered OR observations you witnessed during the implementation of your plan.

Present data/numbers or observations in a table.

This may include how the patients react, how the nurses react, and what impact it had on patient outcomes, unit practices, or organizational processes.

  1. After presenting your data/observations in a table, you will also answer the following questions:

“Did everything go as planned?”

If yes, provide a brief summary.  If no, provide a brief summary.

“Did I have to modify the plan?”

If yes, describe what you modified and why?

If no, state that no modifications were necessary.

Part III: Study

  1. After implementation, you will study the results (i.e., data/numbers or observations that you gathered).
    1. If you will use observations instead of numbers as your data, you will need to write very detailed notes on what you observed.

2.  What did you learn?

Did you meet your measurement goals?

If yes, provide a brief summary.  If no, provide a brief summary.

Part IV: Act

What did you conclude from this cycle?

You will write what you came away with for this implementation and whether it worked.

If it did not work, what can you do differently in your next PDSA cycle to address what went wrong?

If it did work, is your unit ready to implement your intervention across the unit or healthcare system?

References & Citations (i.e., Parenthetical & Narrative)

Please note that you must list all your references in a separate slide(s) at the end of your presentation.

All references must be cited in APA 7th edition.

All citations (i.e., parenthetical or narrative) must be cited in APA 7th edition.

Please note that every time you use information gathered from a source or AI, you must use a parenthetical or narrative citation for each in your PowerPoint slides.

If you do not use a citation, then the information is considered to be plagiarized.

To avoid any issues with plagiarism, you will need to cite all your information and then list your sources as references in the “References” section.

Formatting:

APA 7th edition Formatting:

Please make sure to consult your APA 7th edition manual or one of the following APA 7th edition websites:

APA Style Guide – Please review to learn about citations and references

 (https://mdc.instructure.com/courses/131153/modules/items/12175269)

https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/index.html

 (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/index.html)

Use of AI:

When you use AI in any academic assignment, you must cite your use of AI in your “References”.  Please review the following resources to learn how to cite AI in your “References”:

https://guides.lib.purdue.edu/c.php?g=1371380&p=10135074

( https://guides.lib.purdue.edu/c.php ?g=1371380&p =10135074)

https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt  (https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite- chatgp t)

Handout

Design a handout to give out on the day of your presentation to your preceptor and other audience members (i.e, unit leadership, other departments. and other team members at your

Note: Full answer to this question is available after purchase.
clinical site)

The handout (one to two pages long) should contain a brief summary of the PDSA project including:  Title of Project

Problem Identified

Plan: State PICOT question

Do: What did you observe? (Use data to answer this question)

Study: What did you learn? Did you meet your measurement goals?  Act: What did you conclude from this cycle?

Add photos, graphics, tables, etc. to your handout to enhance presentation of information

A screenshot of the handout should be included in your PDSA PowerPoint presentation after your “References” slide.

Discussion Questions

Student will create three (3) discussion questions to ask the audience at the end of presentation.

These questions will be integrated into the PDSA PowerPoint presentation after the slide containing the screenshot of the “handout”.

One question per slide.

Presentation Day

Ask you preceptor if a conference room is available for you to present your PDSA project  If a conference room is available, please reserve room.

Day of presentation, please arrive early and test out your audio/visual equipment.  Bring a copy of your presentation on a portable drive.

Email a copy of the presentation to yourself as a backup.  Wear professional attire.

Bring photocopies of the handout for your guests.

Take a picture of yourself and the staff on the day of the presentation and copy and paste it to your “Title” PowerPoint slide (i.e., first slide of your presentation).

AI Policy on Acceptable and Responsible Use of Copilot for PDSA Assignment Objective:

To ensure the ethical, responsible, and effective use of Copilot in completing the PDSA (Plan-Do-Study- Act) assignment.

Scope:

This policy applies to all students using Copilot for their PDSA assignment.

Policy Guidelines:
  1. Purpose of Use:

Copilot should be used as a supplementary tool to enhance your learning and assist in the development of your PDSA report. It is not a replacement for your own critical thinking and effort.

2.  Academic Integrity:

All work submitted must be your own. While Copilot can provide suggestions and guidance, you are responsible for ensuring that the final content reflects your understanding and original thought.

Properly attribute any direct contributions from Copilot where applicable, and ensure that your use of the tool aligns with the institution’s academic integrity policies.

3.  Ethical Use:

Use Copilot to support ethical research and writing practices. Avoid using the tool to generate content that is misleading, plagiarized, or violates copyright laws.

Ensure that any data or information used in your assignment is obtained and used ethically, respecting privacy and confidentiality.

4.  Transparency:

Be transparent about the use of Copilot in your reflection and final report. Clearly indicate how and where Copilot was utilized in your project.

Reflect on the impact of using Copilot in your work, as outlined in the reflection instructions.

5.  Limitations and Critical Evaluation:

Recognize the limitations of AI tools. Copilot is designed to assist and enhance your work, but it is not infallible. Always critically evaluate the suggestions and content generated by Copilot.

Do not rely solely on Copilot for complex decision-making or analysis. Use your judgment and consult additional resources as needed.

6.  Respectful Use:

Use Copilot respectfully and responsibly. Avoid using the tool to generate inappropriate, harmful, or offensive content.

Ensure that your interactions with Copilot are professional and aligned with the educational goals of the assignment.

7.  Compliance:

Adherence to this policy is mandatory. Non-compliance may result in academic penalties. See TurnItIn policy below and the “Academic Dishonesty” policy stated in the course’s syllabus.

Review and Updates:

This AI policy will be reviewed periodically and updated as necessary to ensure it remains relevant and effective.

By following these guidelines, you can ensure that your use of Copilot is both responsible and

beneficial to your learning experience. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please reach out to your instructor.

TurnItIn

When submitting your assignment in Canvas, please note that your work will be reviewed by TurnItIn for similarities to other published work.

Any work that scores 20% or higher in TurnItIn will receive a grade of 0 points. If your score is 20% or higher, please review to see where your total similarity percentage is coming from.

Then, revise your work and resubmit until your score is less than 20%.

Please note that TurnItIn does scan for use of AI. For this reason, please make sure to adhere to the AI policy listed above.

Please upload/submit the PowerPoint presentation in Canvas using the above guidelines before the due date and time.

Criteria Ratings Pts
Title of the Presentation 10 pts Outstanding

Clear, concise engaging and connects to the purpose of work

 5 pts Acceptable

Clear but not engaging or not connecting to the purpose of work

 2.5 pts Unacceptable

Unclear, does not connect to the purpose of work

  

 

 

10 pts
PLAN 10 pts Outstanding

Comprehensively describes problem identified and method used to identify the problem (i.e., clinical site’s EHR, feedback from patients, staff members, and family members, or observations), what the plan is, the PICO(T) question approved in Module 2, and summarizes results of the literature review in a table format.

 5 pts Acceptable

Adequately describes problem identified and method used to identify the problem (i.e., clinical site’s EHR, feedback from patients, staff members, and family members, or observations), what the plan is, the PICO(T) question approved min Module 2, and summary of the results of the literature review in a table format.

 2.5 pts Unacceptable

Provides a limited description of the problem identified and/or method used to identify the problem (i.e., clinical site’s EHR, feedback from patients, staff members, and family members, or observations), what the plan is, the PICO(T) question approved in Module 2, and results of the literature review in a table format.

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10 pts
THE

PROCESS

 10 pts Outstanding

Succinctly identifies all actions taken to implement the plan (i.e., evidence- based intervention), population (i.e., minimum of ten patients, staff members, family members, or process), and time frame (i.e., must be on dates you attend clinical rotation).

 5 pts Acceptable

Identifies some actions taken to implement the plan (i.e., evidence-based intervention), population (i.e., minimum of seven patients, staff members, family members, or process), and time frame (i.e., must be on dates you attend clinical rotation).

 2.5 pts Unacceptable

Fails to identify actions taken to implement the plan (problem, population, and time limit). Time frame for PDSA project falls outside student’s clinical practicum period.

Population (i.e., patients, staff members, family members) or process) is less than seven.

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

10 pts
DO 10 pts Outstanding Clearly describes

observations made during

the implementation period and demonstrates data

 5 pts Acceptable

Describes some vague observations during implementation period and some data collection over

 2.5 pts Unacceptable

Does not describe any observations or collection of data over the

 10 pts

Related; Identify an older adult you know, or an older adult who is a character from a film or book. Please choose a character who is complex and portrayed in their social context.

Criteria Ratings Pts
  collected over the intervention period of the project. the intervention period of the project. intervention period of the project.  
Literature Supporting Intervention 10 pts Outstanding

Clearly describes and summarizes the current state of literature related to the intervention. (Uses 5 or more articles)

 5 pts Acceptable

Adequately describes and summarizes the current state of literature related to the intervention. (Uses only 4 articles).

 2.5 pts Unacceptable

Poor description of current state of the literature related to the intervention (Uses less than 4 articles).

  

 

 

 

10 pts
STUDY 10 pts Outstanding

Clearly presents findings of the intervention in a table format, describes what was learned, and states whether or not goal was met.

 5 pts Acceptable

Vaguely describes findings of the intervention in a table format, what was learned, and whether or not goal was met.

 2.5 pts Unacceptable

Fails to present the findings of the intervention in a table format, and/or what was learned, and/or whether goals were met or not.

  

 

 

 

10 pts
ACT 10 pts Outstanding

Provides detail discussion (i.e., summary) of the findings of the PDSA cycle, if the plan worked, draws logical conclusion from the data, and discusses dissemination of findings.

 5 pts Acceptable

Vaguely describes the findings of the PDSA cycle, if the plan worked, conclusion from the data, and dissemination of findings.

 2.5 pts Unacceptable Fails to discuss the

findings of the PDSA cycle,

if the plan worked, conclusion from the data, or dissemination of findings.

  

 

 

 

 

10 pts
APA Format 10 pts Outstanding

APA (7th edition) style followed correctly throughout the entire presentation including title page, citations(i.e., parenthetical & narrative) and separate slide for “References”.

 5 pts Acceptable

APA (7th edition) style and formatting have some minor errors with title page, citations(i.e., parenthetical & narrative) and separate slide for “References”.

 2.5 pts Unacceptable

APA (7th edition) formatting has major issues. More than 10 errors in the presentation with title page, citations(i.e., parenthetical & narrative) and separate slide for “References”.

  

 

 

 

 

10 pts

 

 

Criteria Ratings Pts
Presentation 10 pts Outstanding

The PowerPoint presentation is clear and engaging, and well- organized. Any audio or visual aids (e.g., slides, music, etc) contribute meaningfully to the presentation. The logic of the presentation is easy to follow. All verbal and/or written information is legible, understandable, and easy to see/hear.

 5 pts Acceptable

The PowerPoint presentation is clear and organized. The visuals are appealing, but the presenter was unclear presenting the issue.

 2.5 pts Unacceptable

The PowerPoint presentation was unclear and difficult to follow. The logical flow was confusing. The presentation was overly wordy, robotic, and/or audio and visual aids failed to add anything to the understandability of the presentation.

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10 pts
Handout 10 pts Full Marks

The handout is well- organized and covers key points of the PDSA cycle.

 5 pts Acceptable

The handout is organized but only covers some of the key points of the PDSA cycle.

 0 pts Unacceptable

The handout is poorly design and difficult to read, missing the majority of the key points, or is completely missing.

  

 

 

 

10 pts
Total Points: 100

 

Order This Paper

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “[Order] PDSA Project & PowerPoint Presentation”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related products

error: Content is protected !!