MBA 580 Module Seven Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Organizational creativity and innovation have proven to be challenging concepts to measure. There is not a particular output that indicates organizational levels of innovation. To flourish, innovation and creativity must be fostered within the organization. They must be established as cultural values in order for the organization to see the benefits.
Prompt
Write a paper evaluating business metrics for innovation. Although business metrics generally measure symptoms or outputs of an organization’s culture, we can find correlations between some business metrics and the quality of an organization’s innovation culture. Review the table shown below and answer the following questions. Consider the metrics in the table and evaluate if each is a good measure of innovation and creativity.
Is the number of active products an indicator of innovation, or an indicator of whether the innovation is incremental or discontinuous? Is research and development (R&D) headcount an indicator of innovation or labor efficiency?
What would it mean if any of these metrics increased over time?
Evaluate and select which company (INAGG, Inc. or AMMB, Inc.) is most likely to have a culture that supports innovation and creativity.
How might non-R&D staff time dedicated to experimenting with new products be an indicator of an innovation culture? What are some scenarios in which having more patents would not be a good indicator of an innovation culture?
Discuss the ability, and limitations, of metrics such as the ones in the table and business intelligence (BI) to measure the ability of an organization to innovate or support employee creativity.
What are the limitations of the metrics that you think are the best indicators of innovation culture? Could some of the limitations be avoided by using a combination of metrics?
How could business intelligence be used to evaluate limitations of metrics?
| Number of active products | 12 | 6 |
| Research and development (R&D) budget | $10M | $14M |
| R&D headcount | 52 | 33 |
| % of sales from products introduced in the past four years | 15% | 35% |
| Number of new products launched in the past four years | 7 | 3 |
| Employee time dedicated to experimenting with new products | Not tracked | 10% |
| Number of patents
Note: Full answer to this question is available after purchase.
|
7 | 23 |
| Note: Both companies are in the same industry and make similar products. They have the same number of total employees, revenue, and length of time in business. | ||
What to Submit
Submit a two-page Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. You are not required to use sources; however, if you choose to use sources, they should be cited in APA format. Consult the Shapiro Library APA Style Guide for more information on citations.
Module Seven Short Paper Rubric
| Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Evaluates each metric in the chart as to whether it is a good measure of innovation and creativity | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include evaluating all of the listed metrics | Does not attempt criterion | 30 | |
| Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Evaluates and selects which company is most likely to have a culture that supports innovation and creativity | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include evaluation of both companies | Does not attempt criterion | 30 | |
|
|
Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Discusses the ability and limitations of metrics, such as the ones in the chart, and business intelligence to measure the ability of an organization to innovate or support employee creativity | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include identifying the limitations of metrics and business intelligence to measure the ability of an organization to innovate or support employee creativity | Does not attempt criterion | 30 |
| Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purpose | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readability | Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas | 10 | |
| 100% | |||||
Related; FIN 320 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
Order This Paper
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.