Health Promotion Program Proposal
Description
Over the duration of this course you will write a scholarly paper, “Health Promotion Program Proposal,” addressing existing knowledge related to health promotion based on one practice problem (condition) that you will select from the list below.
- Heart disease
- Cancer
- COPD
- Obesity
- High blood pressure
- Type II Diabetes
- Depression
- Community acquired pneumonia
Select one. In the proposal, you will also develop a health promotion program to meet a health need of a vulnerable population in your potential concentration area or community.
The proposal must demonstrate graduate school level writing and critical analysis. The final version of your proposal is due in week 11
For this assignment you will submit Part One of your proposal in week 4, detailing a health problem that is prevalent within your community and demonstrating your research of health promotion strategies for addressing this specific health problem.
Directions
The first page should be your introductory page.
Second page will be your selected condition and the PICOT question. Below there are examples to guide you in developing your question:
For an intervention/therapy:
In _______(P), what is the effect of _______(I) on ______(O) compared with _______(C) within
Prevention:
For ________ (P) does the use of ______ (I) reduce the future risk of ________ (O) compared with _________ (C)?
Prognosis/Predictions
Does __________ (I) influence ________ (O) in patients who have _______ (P) over ______ (T)?
For additional information and tools about how to create you question, please visit: https://csulb.libguides.com/nursing/pico
The PICOT question is due in week II. Bring it to class to be reviewed and approved.
- Introduction. Describe the health problem. Don’t type “Introduction”. (1 paragraph).
Using data and statistics, support your claim that the issue you selected is a problem.
What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program?
Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable.
- Describe the vulnerable population. (1-2 paragraph).
What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population?
Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.
- Provide a review of literature from scholarly journals (at least 2, one of those two should be systematic review supporting what you wish to accomplish) of evidence-based interventions that address the problem. (2 paragraph, one for each article).
After completing a literature search related to effective interventions for your chosen health promotion activity, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found and how this evidence supports your ideas.
- Select and present an appropriate health promotion/disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model that best serves as the guiding framework for the proposal. (1-2 paragraph).
For this assignment a conclusion paragraph is not required.
Paper Requirements
Three to five pages in length (excluding title page, references, and appendices)
Follow APA format
Cite a minimum of five research articles, including the two sources you will use as body of evidence in the literature search, in point 3.
To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Home.
Description
This is a continuation of the health promotion program proposal, part one, which you submitted previously. Please approach this assignment as an opportunity to integrate instructor feedback from part I and expand on ideas adhering to the components of the MAP-IT strategy. Include necessary levels of detail you feel appropriate to assure stakeholder buy-in.
Directions
You have already completed the steps 1-4. Make sure you revise this initial submission according to your instructor’s comments.
- Describe the health problem. Using data and statistics support your claim that the issue you selected is a problem. What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program? Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable.
- Describe the vulnerable population and setting. What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.
- Provide a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem. After completing a library search related to effective interventions for your chosen health promotion activity, you will write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found. You might consult research texts for information on how to write a review of the literature found in your search.
- Select an appropriate health promotion/disease prevention theoretical framework or conceptual model that would best serve as the framework guiding the proposal. Provide rationale for your selection which includes discussion of the concepts of the selected model
For this assignment add criteria 5-8 as detailed below:
- Propose a health promotion program using an evidence-based intervention found in your literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting. Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role. Be certain to include a timeline. (2 to 4 paragraph. You may use bullets if appropriate).
- Thoroughly describe the intended outcomes. Describe the outcomes in detail concurrent with the SMART goal approach. (1 paragraph).
- Provide a detailed plan for evaluation for each outcome. (1 paragraph).
- Thoroughly describe possible barriers/challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/challenges. (1 paragraph).
- Conclude the paper with a Conclusion paragraph. Don’t type the word “Conclusion”. Here you will share your insights about this strategy and your expectations regarding achieving your goals. (1 paragraph).
HUMN 6912 – Mental Health Law.
Paper Requirements
Your assignment should be 7-8 pages (excluding title page, references, and appendices), following APA standards.
Remember, your Proposal must be a scholarly paper demonstrating graduate school level writing and critical analysis of existing nursing knowledge about health promotion.
Assignment rubric
Case study I
[100 Points Total]
| ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC | ||||||
| A. B. Project Content
90 points possible |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Score |
|
1.Describe the health problem. Using data and statistics, support your claim that the issue you selected is a problem. What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program? Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measureable |
Did not identified the problem | Poorly identified the problem and aspect to address | Vaguely identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address | Briefly identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address
|
Thoroughly identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address | |
|
2.Describe the vulnerable population. What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified. |
Did not identified or described population supported by evidence. | Poorly identified or described population supported by evidence. | Vaguely identified or described population supported by evidence. | Briefly identified or described population supported by evidence. | Thoroughly identified or described population supported by evidence. | |
| 3.Provide a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions
that address the problem. After completing a library search related to effective interventions for your chosen health promotion activity, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found. You might consult research texts for information on how to write a review of the literature found in your search. |
Did not provide a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem. | Poorly provided a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem.
|
Vaguely provided a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem.
|
Briefly provided a review of literature from
Note: Full answer to this question is available after purchase.
|
Thoroughly provided a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem.
|
|
| 4. Select and present an appropriate health promotion/
disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model that best serves as the guiding framework for the proposal. |
Did not select and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model | Poorly selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model | Vaguely selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model | Briefly selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model | Thoroughly selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model | |
| Total Points | ___/20 | |||||
| Percent Accomplished | ___% | |||||
(___% x 90 pts) |
___ pts | |||||
| B. Organization and Formatting
25 points possible |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Score |
|
Organization |
||||||
| Organizes project and writes well. | No project or paper submitted. | Project was unorganized and poorly written. | Project was somewhat organized and overall writing left room for improvement. | Project was well-organized, but overall writing left room for improvement. | Project was thoroughly organized and well-written. | |
| States ideas clearly and logically. | No project or paper submitted. | Ideas were not stated clearly or logically. | Some ideas were stated clearly and logically. | Most ideas were stated clearly and logically. | All ideas were stated clearly and logically. | |
| Writes relevant content. | No project or paper submitted. | Project was off topic and not relevant. | Some portions of project were on topic and relevant. | Project was mostly on topic and relevant. | Project was thoroughly on topic and relevant. | |
|
Formatting |
||||||
| Uses Course Policies formatting guidelines. | No project or paper submitted. | No formatting guidelines were followed. | Some guidelines were followed. | Most guidelines were followed. | All formatting guidelines were followed and the template was used. | |
| Avoids spelling and grammatical errors. | No project or paper submitted. | Greater than 6 spelling or grammatical errors. | 4 to 6 spelling or grammatical errors. | 1 to 3 spelling or grammatical errors. | No spelling or grammatical errors. | |
| Total Points | ___/10 | |||||
| Percent Accomplished | ___% | |||||
| B. Organization and Formatting Points
( ___% 25 pts) |
___ pts | |||||
| Total Points: (A +B) / 100 | ___/100 | |||||
Assignment rubric
Case Study Part II
[100 Points Total]
| A. Project Content
90 points possible |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Score |
|
1. Describe the health problem. Using data and statistics, support your claim that the issue you selected is a problem. What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program? Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measureable |
Did not identified the problem | Poorly identified the problem and aspect to address | Vaguely identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address | Briefly identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address
|
Thoroughly identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address | |
|
2. Describe the vulnerable population. What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified. |
Did not identified or described population supported by evidence. | Poorly identified or described population supported by evidence. | Vaguely identified or described population supported by evidence. | Briefly identified or described population supported by evidence. | Thoroughly identified or described population supported by evidence. | |
| 3. Provide a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions
that address the problem. After completing a library search related to effective interventions for your chosen health promotion activity, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found. You might consult research texts for information on how to write a review of the literature found in your search. |
Did not provide a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions
that address the problem. |
Poorly provided a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions
that address the problem.
|
Vaguely provided a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions
that address the problem.
|
Briefly provided a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions
that address the problem.
|
Thoroughly provided a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions
that address the problem.
|
|
| 4. Select and present an appropriate health promotion/
disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model that best serves as the guiding framework for the proposal. |
Did not select and present an appropriate health promotion/
disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model |
Poorly selected and present an appropriate health promotion/
disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model |
Vaguely selected and present an appropriate health promotion/
disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model |
Briefly selected and present an appropriate health promotion/
disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model |
Thoroughly selected and present an appropriate health promotion/
disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model |
|
| 5. Provide an overview of your implementation plan complete with a summary of
communication ideas and a timeline. |
Did not . provide an overview of your implementation plan complete with a summary of
communication ideas and a timeline. |
Poorly provided an overview of your implementation plan complete with a summary of
communication ideas and a timeline. |
Vaguely provided an overview of your implementation plan complete with a summary of
communication ideas and a timeline. |
Briefly provided an overview of your implementation plan complete with a summary of
communication ideas and a timeline. |
Thoroughly provided an overview of your implementation plan complete with a summary of
communication ideas and a timeline. |
|
| 6.Thoroughly describe the intended outcomes. Describe the outcomes in detail concurrent with the SMART goal approach. | Did not describe the intended outcomes. | Poorly described the intended outcomes. | Vaguely described the intended outcomes. | Briefly described the intended outcomes. | Thoroughly described the intended outcomes. Describe the outcomes in detail concurrent with the SMART goal approach. | |
| 7. Provide a detailed plan for evaluation for each outcome. | Did not. provide a detailed plan for evaluation for each outcome.
|
Poorly provided a plan for evaluation for each outcome. | Vaguely provided a plan for evaluation for each outcome. | Briefly provided a plan for evaluation for each outcome. | Provided a detailed plan for evaluation for each outcome. | |
| 8. Thoroughly describe possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. | Did not describe possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. | Poorly described possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. | Vaguely described possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. | Briefly described possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. | Thoroughly described possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. | |
| Total Points | ___/32 | |||||
| Percent Accomplished | ___% | |||||
| A. Project Content Points
(___% x 90 pts) |
___ pts | |||||
| B. Organization and Formatting
10 points possible |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Score |
|
Organization |
||||||
| Organizes project and writes well. | No project or paper submitted. | Project was unorganized and poorly written. | Project was somewhat organized and overall writing left room for improvement. | Project was well-organized, but overall writing left room for improvement. | Project was thoroughly organized and well-written. | |
| States ideas clearly and logically. | No project or paper submitted. | Ideas were not stated clearly or logically. | Some ideas were stated clearly and logically. | Most ideas were stated clearly and logically. | All ideas were stated clearly and logically. | |
| Writes relevant content. | No project or paper submitted. | Project was off topic and not relevant. | Some portions of project were on topic and relevant. | Project was mostly on topic and relevant. | Project was thoroughly on topic and relevant. | |
|
Formatting |
||||||
| Uses Course Policies formatting guidelines. | No project or paper submitted. | No formatting guidelines were followed. | Some guidelines were followed. | Most guidelines were followed. | All formatting guidelines were followed and the template was used. | |
| Avoids spelling and grammatical errors. | No project or paper submitted. | Greater than 6 spelling or grammatical errors. | 4 to 6 spelling or grammatical errors. | 1 to 3 spelling or grammatical errors. | No spelling or grammatical errors. | |
| Total Points | ___/10 | |||||
| Percent Accomplished | ___% | |||||
| B. Organization and Formatting Points
( ___% 25 pts) |
___ pts | |||||
| Total Points: (A +B) / 100 | ___/100 |
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.