CJ 207 Module Six Assignment Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
In this assignment, you will summarize and explain the impact of landmark cases.
Prompt
In Project Three, you will examine landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases and their impact on police, courts, corrections, and juveniles. In this assignment, you will prepare for this project by summarizing and explaining the impact of other landmark cases.
First, choose two landmark cases from the list below and summarize them in 50–75 words.
Then, using the same two cases you chose for summary, in 150–300 words, explain the impact these cases had on the policy, procedure, or practice of criminal justice.
Use the Module Six Assignment template to complete this assignment.
Specifically, the following rubric criteria must be addressed:
- Summarize two landmark cases from the provided list.
- Explain the impact of the cases you chose for summary.
What to Submit
This assignment must be completed using the provided Module Six Assignment template Word Document. Any references must be cited in APA format.
Shapiro Library APA Style Guide
Module Six Assignment Rubric
| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations (100%) | Meets Expectations (85%) | Partially Meets Expectations (55%) | Does Not Meet Expectations (0%) | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clear Communication | Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding | Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding | Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication | 15 |
| Summary of Case 1 | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Summarizes a landmark case from the provided list | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include clearly summarizing the
Note: Full answer to this question is available after purchase.
|
Does not attempt criterion | 15 |
| Impact of Case 1 | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Explains the impact of the case chosen for summary | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of the identified case on policies, procedures, or practices | Does not attempt criterion | 25 |
| Summary of Case 2 | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Summarizes a landmark case from the provided list | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include clearly summarizing the case | Does not attempt criterion | 15 |
| Impact of Case 2 | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Explains the impact of the case chosen for summary | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of the identified case on policies, procedures, or practices | Does not attempt criterion | 25 |
| Citations and Attributions | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errors | Uses citation for ideas requiring attribution | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors | Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution | 5 |
| Total: | 100% | ||||
CJ 207 Project One Guidelines and Rubric.
CJ-207 Assignment 6-2 Template: Landmark Cases
Complete the following template by replacing the bracketed text with your responses
| Case Name: |
| Summary: [Insert text here]
|
| Impact of the case: [Insert text here]
|
CJ 207 Project One Guidelines and Rubric.
| Case Name: |
| Summary: [Insert text here]
|
| Impact of the case: [Insert text here]
|
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.