Sale!
Zoëcon Corporation: Insect Growth Regulators

[ANSWER] PHI-413V-RS-T3 TOPIC 3: APPLYING THE FOUR PRINCIPLES: CASE STUDY

Original price was: $ 67.45.Current price is: $ 55.00.

PHI-413V-RS-T3 TOPIC 3: APPLYING THE FOUR PRINCIPLES: CASE STUDY

Student Name:

Part 1: Chart (60 points)

Based on the reading of the “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and topic Resources, use the four boxes approach to organize relevant ethical issues related to the four principles (beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice). Provide the information by means of bullet points with complete sentences in the box. Gather as much data as possible within this 1-page chart.

Medical Indications

Beneficence and Nonmaleficence

 Patient Preferences

Autonomy
·       <complete sentence about ethical issue>

·

 ·       <complete sentence about ethical issue>

·
Quality of Life

Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy

 Contextual Features

Justice and Fairness
·       <complete sentence about ethical issue>

·

 ·       <complete sentence about ethical issue>

·
Order Now
Category:
Order This Paper

PHI-413V-RS-T3 TOPIC 3: APPLYING THE FOUR PRINCIPLES: CASE STUDY

Student Name:
 

Part 1: Chart (60 points)

Based on the reading of the “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and topic Resources, use the four boxes approach to organize relevant ethical issues related to the four principles (beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice). Provide the information by means of bullet points with complete sentences in the box. Gather as much data as possible within this 1-page chart.

Medical Indications

Beneficence and Nonmaleficence

 Patient Preferences

Autonomy
·       <complete sentence about ethical issue>

·

 ·       <complete sentence about ethical issue>

·
Quality of Life

Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy

 Contextual Features

Justice and Fairness
·       <complete sentence about ethical issue>

·

 ·       <complete sentence about ethical issue>

·

Part 2: Evaluation

Answer each of the following questions about how the four principles approach and four boxes approach would be applied:

  1. In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, how would each of the principles be specified in this case? Explain why. (40 points)
 

 
  1. In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, how might a Christian weigh and balance each of the four principles in this case? Explain why. (40 points)
 

 

References: (10 points)

Case Study: Healing and Autonomy

Mike and Joanne are the parents of James and Samuel, identical twins born 8 years ago. James is currently suffering from acute glomerulonephritis, kidney failure. James was originally brought into the hospital for complications associated with a strep throat infection. The spread of the A streptococcus infection led to the subsequent kidney failure. James’s condition was acute enough to warrant immediate treatment. Usually cases of acute glomerulonephritis caused by strep infection tend to improve on their own or with an antibiotic. However, James also had elevated blood pressure and enough fluid buildup that required temporary dialysis to relieve.

The attending physician suggested immediate dialysis. After some time of discussion with Joanne, Mike informs the physician that they are going to forego the dialysis and place their faith in God. Mike and Joanne had been moved by a sermon their pastor had given a week ago and also had witnessed

Note: Full answer to this question is available after purchase.
a close friend regain mobility when she was prayed over at a healing service after a serious stroke. They thought it more prudent to take James immediately to a faith healing service instead of putting James through multiple rounds of dialysis. Yet, Mike and Joanne agreed to return to the hospital after the faith healing services later in the week, and in hopes that James would be healed by then.

Two days later the family returned and was forced to place James on dialysis, as his condition had deteriorated. Mike felt perplexed and tormented by his decision to not treat James earlier. Had he not enough faith? Was God punishing him or James? To make matters worse, James’s kidneys had deteriorated such that his dialysis was now not a temporary matter and was in need of a kidney transplant. Crushed and desperate, Mike and Joanne immediately offered to donate one of their own kidneys to James, but they were not compatible donors. Over the next few weeks, amidst daily rounds of dialysis, some of their close friends and church members also offered to donate a kidney to James. However, none of them were tissue matches.

James’s nephrologist called to schedule a private appointment with Mike and Joanne. James was stable, given the regular dialysis, but would require a kidney transplant within the year. Given the desperate situation, the nephrologist informed Mike and Joanne of a donor that was an ideal tissue match, but as of yet had not been considered—James’s brother Samuel.

Mike vacillates and struggles to decide whether he should have his other son Samuel lose a kidney or perhaps wait for God to do a miracle this time around. Perhaps this is where the real testing of his faith will come in? Mike reasons, “This time around it is a matter of life and death. What could require greater faith than that?”

RELATED: Imagine you are a communications manager for a city or large county school district. You may select a real city for this assignment, which might make this a lot more real. Ensure you find some good sources, these are fundamental to the rubric scoring.

Order This Paper

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “[ANSWER] PHI-413V-RS-T3 TOPIC 3: APPLYING THE FOUR PRINCIPLES: CASE STUDY”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related products

error: Content is protected !!