Sale!

[SOLVED] MPH/530 WK 5 DISCUSSION – UNDERSTANDING BIAS AND CONFOUNDING

Original price was: $ 45.00.Current price is: $ 40.00.

Wk 5 Discussion – Understanding Bias and Confounding [due Thurs]

Discussion Topic
Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member.

Due Thursday

Select and read 1 case study below. Then, respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

Order Now
Category:
Order This Paper

Wk 5 Discussion – Understanding Bias and Confounding [due Thurs]

Discussion Topic
Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member.

Due Thursday

Select and read 1 case study below. Then, respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

  • Where was the study at
Note: Full answer to this question is available after purchase.
risk for bias, confounding, and/or validity threats such as low compliance and lack of baseline comparability?
  • As a public health researcher, what steps would you take to mitigate each potential research study problem?
  • What is the impact of biased responses on your study? How would you mitigate these risks?
  • Include the reference used to write your response. The reference MUST be cited within your post.

    RELATED: Wk 4 – Course Capstone Project: Epidemiological Principles of Study Design

    Order This Paper

    Reviews

    There are no reviews yet.

    Be the first to review “[SOLVED] MPH/530 WK 5 DISCUSSION – UNDERSTANDING BIAS AND CONFOUNDING”

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    error: Content is protected !!