Sale!
NR324 ADULT HEALTH II RUA: PRACTICE READINESS PAPER GUIDELINES

[ORDER] S311: THE ANALYTICAL ESSAY LEARNING ACTIVITY – PREPARE AN ANALYTICAL ESSAY

Original price was: $ 78.00.Current price is: $ 70.00.

S311: THE ANALYTICAL ESSAY LEARNING ACTIVITY – PREPARE AN ANALYTICAL ESSAY

Instructions:

  1. Analyze and evaluate the major points of your case study for research utilizing the principles of mission command.
  2. Use your time to develop a deep understanding of your topic to fully explain your analysis. You are required to give an in depth introduction of your topic.
  3. Then develop the body of the paper fully using not less than three full pages and no more than five pages.
  4. Provide transitional sentences from one topic to the next.
  5. Gather one additional reference for your essay.
  6. Ensure you use Times New Roman, 12-point font and the current APA writing style (Student Paper).
  7. Your essay should be typed, double-spaced on standard-sized paper (8.5″ x 11″) with 1″ margins on all sides.
  8. Your essay should include four major sections:
    1. Title Page
    2. Thesis Statement
    3. Main Body
    4. References Page
Order Now
Category:
Order This Paper

S311: THE ANALYTICAL ESSAY LEARNING ACTIVITY – PREPARE AN ANALYTICAL ESSAY

Instructions:

  1. Analyze and evaluate the major points of your case study for research utilizing the principles of mission command.
  2. Use your time to develop a deep understanding of your topic to fully explain your analysis. You are required to give an in depth introduction of your topic.
  3. Then develop the body of the paper fully using not less than three full pages and no more than five pages.
  4. Provide transitional sentences from one topic to the next.
  5. Gather one additional reference for your essay.
  6. Ensure you use Times New Roman, 12-point font and the current APA writing style (Student Paper).
  7. Your essay should be typed, double-spaced on standard-sized paper (8.5″ x 11″) with 1″ margins on all sides.
  8. Your essay should include four major sections:
    1. Title Page
    2. Thesis Statement
    3. Main Body
    4. References Page

SAMPLE OF THIS ESSAY

Below is a structured analytical essay following the S311 requirements.

Title: Command in the Cauldron: An Analysis of the Battle of 73 Easting through the Lens of Mission Command

Student Name: [Your Name]

Institutional Affiliation: [Your Institution]

Course: S311: The Analytical Essay

Date:

Thesis Statement

The overwhelming American victory at the Battle of 73 Easting was not merely a result of technological superiority, but a definitive validation of Mission Command; by fostering mutual trust, accepting prudent risk, and empowering subordinates to exercise disciplined initiative, the Second Armored Cavalry Regiment successfully decimated superior numbers of the Iraqi Republican Guard.

Main Body

Introduction The Battle of 73 Easting, fought on February 26, 1991, stands as one of the most significant tank battles in United States military history. Occurring during the Persian Gulf War, the engagement pitted the 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment (2nd ACR) against the elements of the Iraqi Republican Guard’s Tawakalna Division. The environment was characterized by a blinding sandstorm, near-zero visibility, and a rapidly evolving front line.

Despite these chaotic conditions, American forces achieved a lopsided victory, destroying scores of enemy armored vehicles with zero losses to their own main battle tanks. While the M1A1 Abrams tank and M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle provided a technical edge, the decisive factor was the application of Mission Command. This philosophy of command enables agile and adaptive leadership under conditions of uncertainty. To understand the magnitude of this victory, one must analyze how the principles of Mission Command—specifically mutual trust, disciplined initiative, and mission orders—were synthesized to overcome a numerically superior force in a degraded environment.

Mutual Trust and Shared Understanding The foundation of the success at 73 Easting was the profound mutual trust established between the regimental commander, Colonel Don Holder, and his troop commanders, most notably Captain H.R. McMaster of Eagle Troop. In the months leading up to the invasion, the 2nd ACR engaged in rigorous, realistic training that forged a shared understanding of how the unit would fight. This trust allowed Colonel Holder to provide his subordinates with broad objectives rather than restrictive, micromanaged instructions.

When Eagle Troop crested a ridge and unexpectedly found themselves face-to-face with a massive Iraqi defensive array, McMaster did not have to pause to seek permission to engage. He knew his commander’s intent: to find, fix, and finish the enemy to clear the way for the

Note: Full answer to this question is available after purchase.
main armored thrust. This shared mental model ensured that every soldier, from the tank commander to the loader, understood the “why” behind the operation, allowing them to remain cohesive even when the sandstorm severed visual contact between platoons.

Disciplined Initiative in the Face of the Enemy Building upon the foundation of trust, the principle of disciplined initiative was the catalyst for the tactical breakthrough. As Eagle Troop advanced, they reached the “limit of advance” set by higher headquarters—a line on the map known as the 70 Easting. However, upon reaching this line, McMaster realized that the enemy was positioned just beyond it, caught in a state of relative unpreparedness. Rather than halting and allowing the Iraqi forces to regroup or find their range, McMaster exercised disciplined initiative.

He made the split-second decision to push forward to the 73 Easting line. This move was “disciplined” because it stayed within the framework of the higher commander’s intent—maintaining the momentum of the attack—while “initiative” was required because the specific tactical opportunity could not have been foreseen by the regimental staff. This bold action collapsed the Iraqi defense before they could effectively counter-attack.

Mission Orders and Prudent Risk The transition from movement to contact required a reliance on mission orders that emphasized results rather than specific maneuvers. Colonel Holder’s orders focused on the end state: the destruction of the Republican Guard. This allowed Captain McMaster and his counterparts in Ghost and Iron Troops to adapt their formations based on the terrain and the specific orientation of the Iraqi T-72 tanks. Furthermore, the decision to engage a brigade-sized element with a single cavalry troop represented the acceptance of prudent risk.

In Mission Command, prudent risk is the deliberate exposure to potential injury or loss when the commander judges the outcome to be worth the cost. By attacking aggressively through the storm, the 2nd ACR exploited the Iraqi’s lack of thermal imaging technology. The risk of an overextended pursuit was weighed against the opportunity to achieve a decisive blow, and because the subordinate leaders were empowered, they turned a potential ambush into a rout.

Conclusion The Battle of 73 Easting serves as a timeless case study in the efficacy of Mission Command. The victory was not won by rigid adherence to a pre-set plan, but by the ability of leaders at the point of friction to sense, understand, and act faster than the enemy. By fostering mutual trust, commanders ensured that their intent was understood even in the fog of war.

Through disciplined initiative, leaders like H.R. McMaster turned a chance encounter into a strategic breakthrough. Finally, the use of mission orders and the acceptance of prudent risk allowed the 2nd ACR to maintain a tempo that the Iraqi forces could not match. As modern warfare continues to evolve toward more complex and transparent battlefields, the human element of Mission Command remains the most critical component of military success.

References

McMaster, H. R. (2003). Crack in the Armor: The Battle of 73 Easting. Armor Magazine, 112(3), 24-32.

Sewell, S. T. (2018). Mission Command in the Gulf War: A Revolution in Military Leadership. Military Review Press.

United States Army. (2019). ADP 6-0: Mission Command: Command and Control of Army Forces. Department of the Army.

RELATED: Individual Case Study – Instructions (Descriptive Analysis)

Order This Paper

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “[ORDER] S311: THE ANALYTICAL ESSAY LEARNING ACTIVITY – PREPARE AN ANALYTICAL ESSAY”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related products

error: Content is protected !!