QSO 435 7-1 Discussion: Managing Risks and Uncertainty
Unexpected change, anticipated risks, and uncertainties that exist within the traditional project also exist within an Agile project. For this discussion post, you will take on the role of a proponent supporting risk management in Agile. In your post, describe how risk is managed in Agile. Compare and contrast traditional project management (i.e., waterfall) with Agile. Explain your reasoning for why Agile is better than waterfall, provide examples, and fully develop your ideas so that your peers have plenty of information to which they can reply.
Undergraduate Discussion Rubric
Overview
Your active participation in the discussions is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions will help you make meaningful connections
between the course content and the larger concepts of the course. These discussions give you a chance to express your own thoughts, ask questions, and gain insight from your peers and instructor.
Directions
For each discussion, you must create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.
For your initial post, do the following:
- Write a post of 1 to 2 paragraphs.
- In Module One, complete your initial post by Thursday at 11:59 m. Eastern.
- In Modules Two through Eight, complete your initial post by Thursday at 11:59 m. of your local time zone.
- Consider content from other parts of the course where Use proper citation methods for your discipline when referencing scholarly or popular sources.
For your response posts, do the following:
- Reply to at least two classmates outside of your own initial post
- In Module One, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 m. Eastern.
- In Modules Two through Eight, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59
m. of your local time zone.
Demonstrate more depth and thought than saying things like “I agree” or “You are ” Guidance is provided for you in the discussion prompt.
Rubric
| Critical Elements |
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Needs Improvement |
Not Evident |
Value |
| Comprehension |
Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail
(100%) |
Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using adequate organization and
detail (85%) |
Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and
detail (55%) |
Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea (0%) |
40 |
| Timeliness |
N/A |
Submits initial post on time (100%) |
Submits initial post one day late (55%) |
Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) |
10 |
| Engagement |
Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying
explanation and detail (100%) |
Provides relevant response posts with some explanation
and detail (85%) |
Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some
explanation and detail (55%) |
Provides response posts that are generic with little
explanation or detail (0%) |
30 |
| Critical Elements |
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Needs Improvement |
Not Evident |
Value |
| Writing (Mechanics) |
Writes posts that are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in
citations (100%) |
Writes posts that are easily understood using proper
citation methods where applicable with few errors in
citations (85%) |
Writes posts that are understandable using proper citation methods where
applicable with a number of
errors in citations (55%) |
Writes posts that others are not able to understand and does not use proper citation methods where applicable (0%) |
20 |
| Total |
100% |
QSO 435 6-2 Student Small Group Discussion: Final Project Milestone Four.
Order This Paper
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.