PSY 570 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
Prompt
In Milestone One, you will select a case study to analyze for your final project. For this assignment, review the Final Project Guidelines and Rubric document in the Assignment Guidelines and Rubrics section of the course.
Although the milestones support your successful completion of the final project, note that these assignments are not full drafts of the elements in the final project prompt. You will be working on different skills and aspects of your final project during the term. You will need to complete all elements of your case study analysis for your submission in Module Nine.
To begin your work on this project, select a case study vignette for your final project from the Case Study Vignette Directory found in your required resources.
Make sure to include the following critical elements:
- Identify a case study vignette and use that as the title for the initial post.
- Justify reasons for your case study vignette selection and relate your choice back to chosen professional field of psychology.
- Identify central ethical conflicts of selected case study and describe interactions between the different roles in the scenario.
- Engage in the discussion topic and respond to at least two peers, sharing your thoughts on ethical conflicts.
What to Submit
Share your choice as a discussion topic post by Thursday of Module One in the Case Study Vignette Selection discussion topic for peer and instructor feedback. Identify the title of your chosen case study vignette in your discussion post title. Explain why you chose this particular case study vignette and identify the central ethical conflict evident in the case study.
Go beyond your own case study and explore what your classmates have chosen for their final project. Respond to at least two of your peers by the end of Module One and share your thoughts on their identified central ethical conflict. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your reasoning.
Milestone One Rubric
| Criteria | Proficient (100%) | Needs Improvement (85%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case Study Vignette | Identifies a case study vignette from the Case Study Vignette handout and titles post
Note: Full answer to this question is available after purchase.
|
Identifies a case study vignette from the Case Study Vignette handout but does not title post with the case study vignette title | Does not identify a case study vignette from the Case Study Vignette handout | 20 |
| Justification of Selection | Justifies reasons for selecting case study vignette and relates choice back to chosen professional field of psychology | Explains reasons for selecting case study vignette but does not relate choice back to chosen professional field of psychology | Does not explain reasons for selecting case study vignette | 20 |
| Identification of Ethical Conflict and Interactions | Identifies central ethical conflict of case study and describes interactions between different roles in the scenario | Identifies central ethical conflict of case study but does not assess interactions between different roles in the scenario | Does not identify central ethical conflict of case study | 20 |
| Engagement | Responds to at least two peers and shares thoughts on ethical conflicts | Responds to one peer and shares thoughts on ethical conflicts | Does not respond to any peers | 10 |
| APA Writing | Few errors related to APA style and citations | Some errors related to APA style and citations | Major errors related to APA style and citations | 10 |
| Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format with language that is appropriate to the intended audience | Submission has no major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, organization or audience-appropriate terminology | Submission has critical errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, organization, or audience-specific language that prevent understanding of ideas | 10 |
| Timeliness | Submits initial post on time | Submits initial post one day late | Submits initial post two or more days late | 10 |
| Total: | 100% | |||
RELATED: PSYC4600 RESEARCH PROJECT PART 1: LITERATURE REVIEW
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.