BUS 440: Business Analytics Final Assignment

$ 67.54

Business Analytics Final Assignment

Final Assessment Outline

Competency Name: BUS 440: Business Analytics

Competency Statement: BUS 244. This course focuses on the development and delivery of predictive data analysis for strategic decision making in organizations. Students will apply the performance and competitive advantage.

Final Assessment Title: Business Analyst Strategy Advising Case Study

Program Learning Outcomes: PLOs Assessed in this course include:

BUS BA 3) Our graduates will be able to demonstrate appropriate analytical and quantitative skills by examining a wide range of business models.

ACC BA 4) Our graduates will be able to use clear and concise communication to convey relevant financial and non-financial information so that decision makers can formulate informed decisions.

Order Now
Category:
Order This Paper

Business Analytics Final Assignment

Final Assessment Outline

Competency Name: BUS 440: Business Analytics

Competency Statement: BUS 244. This course focuses on the development and delivery of predictive data analysis for strategic decision making in organizations. Students will apply the performance and competitive advantage.

Final Assessment Title: Business Analyst Strategy Advising Case Study

Program Learning Outcomes: PLOs Assessed in this course include:BUS BA 3) Our graduates will be able to demonstrate appropriate analytical and quantitative skills by examining a wide range of business models.

ACC BA 4) Our graduates will be able to use clear and concise communication to convey relevant financial and non-financial information so that decision makers can formulate informed decisions.

Competency Learning Outcomes (CLOs)BUS 440 1) Develop an understanding of the Five Forces Model of Competition –

  1. level of rivalry in an industry,
  2. potential for new entrants,
  3. power of large suppliers,
  4. power of large customers, and
  5. threat of substitute products.

BUS 440 2) Develop an understanding of business-level strategies –

  1. Low-Cost Strategy,
  2. Differentiation Strategy,
  3. “Stuck in the Middle,” and
  4. Focused Low-Cost and Focused Differentiation Strategies.

BUS 440 3) Develop an understanding of corporate-level strategies –

  1. concentration on a single industry,
  2. vertical integration,
  3. diversification, and
  4. international expansion.

Purpose of the AssessmentThe purpose of this assignment is for you to apply the theoretical knowledge you have mastered in this competency to work analyzing a real-world business case study. You will be combining the five forces model, business-level strategy and corporate strategy to present a comprehensive strategic analysis of a major firm

Submission Artifacts:

  • A 2,000 to 3,000 word paper written from the point of view of a professional business analyst providing strategic guidance to a major firm
  • A Works Cited in APA 7 format containing the woks cited in your paper.

Submission 1: 2,000 to 3,000 word paperFor this essay, select a major firm that has operations in an industry you’re interested in.

Using research from academic business journal articles, reputable news outlets, think tanks, and other high-quality research sources, combined with the content from this course, you will develop a strategic analysis and suggest next steps for that firm.

Your essay should have the following sections:

    • Introduction
      • Provide a clear introduction to the firm and the challenges they face
    • Background
      • Brief and relevant historical background and context for the industry in which the firm operates and the firm’s history
      • Recent challenges and opportunities the firm has faced
      • An evaluation of the firm’s current situation
    • Five Forces Analysis of Industry
      • Using the five forces model as a guide, analyze the industry in which the firm is focused. If the firm is focused in multiple industries, choose an industry important to the firm and of interest to you.
      • Address all five forces in your analysis, and provide advice to the firm based on your findings.
      • Does the five forces model leave anything out? If so, address it here as a limit of or proposed addition to the model.
    • Business Strategy
      • Provide detailed analysis of the firm’s current business-level strategy and evaluate that strategy in light of your five forces analysis of the industry
      • Given industry trends, do you feel they should continue this strategy? What actions should the firm take?
    • Corporate Strategy
      • Provide details of the firm’s current and recent historical corporate strategy, and evaluate that strategy in light of your knowledge of corporate strategy and your analysis of the relevant industry(ies)
      • What is the next corporate-level strategic move this firm should take?
    • Conclusion
      • Provide a clear summary of your advice and address any immediate next steps or additional risks/opportunities your research suggests.

Submission 2: Works Cited

  • Using APA 7, include a list of works cited in this paper.

File Logistics:

  • Submit your final paper, and works cited as a single document (word, google doc or pdf) following APA 7 style.
  • Citations must follow APA 7; all sources must be properly cited.
  • The essay must be 2,000 to 3,000 words in length. The list of works cited does not count towards the total words.

Submit your Work

  • Your completed final assessment documents should be submitted through the Final Assessment link of your competency.
  • Please note, that you can upload multiple files to the Final Assignment link.
  • Make sure the files are converted to a doc, docx, ppt, pptx file. (you can share Google Doc and MS OneDrive documents from the “Choose Existing Activities” button)
  • To upload a file, click “Upload File”
Note: Full answer to this question is available after purchase.
and choose the file(s) from your desktop:

 

More tutorial resources can be found at the UMPI Student eLearning Hub

Final Assessment Rubric

Criterion Exemplary- 4 Proficient- 3 Developing- 2 Emerging- 1
Writing Mechanics APA Style The paper is logical, well- written, and the required length.

Spelling, grammar and punctuation are accurate. APA formatting standards for the citations are followed; the citations and reference page is correct.

The paper is logical, well- written, and the required length. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation are minimal and do not affect readability. APA formatting standards for the citations are mostly

followed with minor errors.

The paper is somewhat logical and well-written; too long or short. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation are present, affecting readability. APA standards for the citations are somewhat followed but with numerous errors. The paper lacks clarity and may be confusing; too long or short.

Numerous errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. Limited if any adherence to APA standards for the citations.

Five forces analysis of Industry Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the five-forces model, and applies that model to chosen case study thoroughly and insightfully Demonstrates a sound understanding of the five forces model, and applies that model to the chosen case study with only minor omissions, errors, or lack of clarity Understanding of the five forces model is only partially demonstrated, and is not well- connected to chosen case study.

Contains errors or substantial omissions in

characterizing the case study and the model.

Understanding of the five-forces model is not

demonstrated. Case study is not analyzed using the five-forces model, or is done so with very substantial errors.

Business-Level strategic advice Business-level strategic advice reflects a sophisticated understanding of the competency material and has been applied thoughtfully and thoroughly to research about the case study. Resultant advice

is insightful and logically

connected to analysis.

Business-level strategic advice reflects a sound understanding of the competency material with minor errors or omissions. Theory has been applied to case study logically with only minor gaps, and resultant advice is connected to the analysis

and may contain minor errors or omissions.

Business-level strategic advice displays a partial understanding of the competency

material. The application of theory to case study has substantial errors or omissions. The included strategic advice is unclear or contains substantial errors or omissions.

Business-level advice does not include substantive reference to covered theory, or contains substantial errors. Major elements of the theory are not addressed. Advice is completely disconnected from theory.
Criterion Exemplary- 4 Proficient- 3 Developing- 2 Emerging- 1
Corporate-level strategic advice Corporate-level strategic advice reflects a sophisticated understanding of the competency material and has been applied thoughtfully and thoroughly to research about the case study. Resultant advice is insightful and logically connected to analysis. Corporate-level strategic advice reflects a sound understanding of the competency material with minor errors or omissions. Theory has been applied to case study logically with only minor gaps, and resultant advice is connected to the analysis and may contain minor

errors or omissions.

Corporate-level strategic advice displays a partial understanding of the competency

material. The application of theory to case study has substantial errors or omissions. The included strategic advice is unclear or contains substantial errors or omisisons.

Corporate-level advice does not include substantive reference to covered theory, or contains substantial errors. Major elements of the theory are not addressed. Advice is completely disconnected from theory.
Quality of Research Research of selected firm for case study is thorough and clearly presented. Research is integrated throughout the essay and used effectively to support analysis. Research of selected firm for case study contains only minor omissions or issues with clarity.

Research is included in every section, though there are sections that would have been improved by additional reference to case study

research.

Research of selected firm is partial or contains one or two major

omissions. There are substantial issues in the clarity of the discussed research and it’s connection to theory.

Research is partially absent and is not adequate to support discussion of theory.

RELATED: BUS 415:CBE2 – Operations Management Final Assignment Order This Paper

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “BUS 440: Business Analytics Final Assignment”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!