Sale!

[ANSWERED] FINCB/571 COMPETENCY 2 ASSESSMENT AND RUBRIC

Original price was: $ 89.67.Current price is: $ 80.67.

FINCB/571 COMPETENCY 2 ASSESSMENT AND RUBRIC

Course Title: Corporate Finance

Competency Assessment Title: Shareholder Analysis

Continue your work with the company you selected in the Competency 1 Assessment.

Research your company’s financial reports for 2019.

Complete a 2- to 3-page FAQ/shareholder analysis.

Evaluate economic conditions that influence company performance. Consider political, environmental, currency (money), global economics, and government influences on economic conditions.

Order Now
Category:
Order This Paper

FINCB/571 COMPETENCY 2 ASSESSMENT AND RUBRIC

Course Title: Corporate Finance

Competency Assessment Title: Shareholder Analysis

Total Number of  Points: 100

Assignment Directions

Resources:

Continue your work with the company you selected in the Competency 1 Assessment.

Research your company’s financial reports for 2019.

Complete a 2- to 3-page FAQ/shareholder analysis.

Evaluate economic conditions that influence company performance. Consider political, environmental, currency (money), global economics, and government influences on economic conditions.

Compare market conditions with the company’s performance for 2019. Conclude how the market conditions that year influenced the company’s performance, such as interest rates, Federal Reserve Bank monetary policy changes, or other market conditions relevant to the company you selected.

Analyze year-over-year performance from 2018 and 2019. Consider key metrics or ratios such as trailing PE ratio, forward PE ratio, price to book, return on assets, and return on equity in your conclusions.

Cite references to support your assignment.

FINCB/571v1 Competency 2 Rubric

Competency Assessment Rubric
Assignment/Performance Criteria Mastery 100% Meets Expectations 85% Not Met 0%
1. Economic Conditions

(weight 30%)

Comprehensively evaluated economic conditions that influence company performance, such as political, environmental, currency (money), global economics, and government influences on economic conditions. Sufficiently evaluated economic conditions that influence company performance, such as political, environmental, currency (money), global economics, and government influences on economic conditions. Insufficiently evaluated economic conditions that influence company performance, such as political, environmental, currency (money), global economics, and government influences on economic conditions or no attempt to evaluate economic conditions that influence company performance, such as political, environmental, currency (money), global economics, and government influences on economic conditions was made.
2.
Note: Full answer to this question is available after purchase.
Market Conditions

(weight 35%)

Thoroughly compared 2019 market conditions with the company’s performance and definitively concluded how the market conditions influenced the company’s performance. Partially compared 2019 market conditions with the company’s performance and sufficiently concluded how the market conditions influenced the company’s performance. Narrowly compared 2019 market conditions with the company’s performance and vaguely concluded how the market conditions influenced the company’s performance or no attempt was made to compare how the market conditions influenced the company’s performance or to conclude how the market conditions influenced the company’s performance.
3. Year-Over-Year Performance

(weight 35%)

Thoroughly analyzed year-over- year performance from 2016

and 2019 and included key metrics or ratios, such as trailing PE ratio, forward PE ratio, price to book, return on assets, and return on equity in your conclusions.

Sufficiently analyzed year-over- year performance from 2016

and 2019 and included key metrics or ratios, such as trailing PE ratio, forward PE ratio, price to book, return on assets, and return on equity in your conclusions.

Insufficiently analyzed year-over- year performance from 2016 and 2019 and included key metrics or ratios, such as trailing PE ratio, forward PE ratio, price to book, return on assets, and return on equity in your conclusions or no attempt was made to analyze year- over-year performance from 2016 and 2019 and key metrics or ratios,

such as trailing PE ratio, forward PE

ratio, price to book, return on assets, and return on equity.

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

RELATED: FINCB/571 COMPETENCY 1 – ASSESSMENT AND RUBRIC

Order This Paper

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “[ANSWERED] FINCB/571 COMPETENCY 2 ASSESSMENT AND RUBRIC”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!