PSY 570 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
Prompt
For Milestone Two, produce a document containing the rough outline using the template provided in your learning environment. You are expected to address the first four elements (title page, case study abstract, detailed case study description, and ethical conflict). Remember that you will use instructor feedback to further revise this milestone, which contains moving pieces of your final project submission.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed within the final project outline template:
- Working title: Include a working title for the case study analysis (you are encouraged to flex your creative muscle).
- Case Study Analysis Abstract: Include a preliminary draft of your abstract of your case study analysis, outlining both the case study vignette and your approach to analyzing the case study.
- Detailed Case Study Analysis Description: Summarize the chosen scenario, the important people, and the important interactions present in your chosen case study.
- The Ethical Conflict: Examine the central ethical conflict of the case study and assess interactions between different roles in the scenario.
What to Submit
Your paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and any referenced sources cited in APA format.
Milestone Two Rubric
| Criteria | Exemplary (100%) | Proficient (90%) | Needs Improvement (70%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working Title | Meets “Proficient” criteria and working title demonstrates creativity | Includes a working title for the case study analysis | Includes a working title for the case study analysis, but working title is not in alignment with the case study | Does not include a working title for the case study analysis | 10 |
| Case Study Analysis Abstract | Meets “Proficient” criteria and abstract is the appropriate length | Includes a draft of the case study analysis abstract that describes both the case study vignette and the approach to analyzing the case study | Includes a draft of the case study analysis abstract but does not describe both case
Note: Full answer to this question is available after purchase.
|
Does not include a case study analysis abstract | 20 |
| Detailed Case Study Analysis Description | Meets “Proficient” criteria and explains approach to analyzing case study | Summarizes the chosen scenario, the important people, and the important interactions present in the case study | Summarizes the chosen scenario, the important people, and the important interactions present in the case study, but is lacking in detail or breadth | Does not summarize the chosen scenario, the important people, and the important interactions present in the case study | 30 |
| The Ethical Conflict | Meets “Proficient” criteria and identifies a strategy for resolving the central ethical conflict | Examines central ethical conflict of case study and assesses interactions between different roles in the scenario | Examines central ethical conflict of case study and assesses interactions between different roles in the scenario, but assessment lacks depth or detail | Does not examine central ethical conflict of case study or assess interaction between different roles in the scenario | 30 |
| APA Writing | No errors related to APA style or citations | Few errors related to related to APA style and citations | Major errors related to APA style and citations | Critical errors related to APA style and citations | 5 |
| Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format with language that is appropriate to the intended audience | Submission has no major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, organization or audience-appropriate terminology | Submission has major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, organization, or audience-appropriate language that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas | Submission has critical errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, organization, or audience-specific language that prevent understanding of ideas | 5 |
| Total: | 100% | ||||
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.