SCI 200 Project Part Two: Speaking Notes Draft Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: An effective presentation includes a summary of the main points in the slides, but the presenter should add additional content in the speaker notes to help explain each point. Some presenters have the the ability to memorize the details through cues in the outline of the presentation, and some can even speak off the cuff. However, for this project, you will create speaker notes for the slides in your presentation, which is due in Module Eight. This will help you consider the outline of your presentation and the content you want to include on each slide.
Prompt: For this assignment, you will be drafting the speaker notes that will accompany your 5- to 7-slide presentation. The speaker notes can be bullet points related to each item on the slides, or more developed paragraphs that help you fill in the details you wouldn’t include on the slides. This choice is up to you, but either way, the speaker notes should contain substantial details that address each of the required parts of your presentation.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
- Provide a brief overview of the scientific background of your issue and How does the issue relate to the natural sciences?
- Explain how the issue impacts the audience. In other words, how is the issue relevant to members of the audience? Why should the audience care about the response to your question or the outcome of your hypothesis? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
- Describe the empirical evidence you have to support your conclusions about the impact of the issue on you personally and on your Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
- Explain why this issue is important to you personally. In other words, why did you select this issue to investigate?
- Illustrate how your investigation of the issue impacted the way you thought about the In other words, how did thinking like a scientist to research, develop a question, and formulate a hypothesis affect what you thought about the issue you selected? How did scientific thinking change the lens through which you viewed the issue? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
- Communicate your message in a way that is tailored to your specific audience. For instance, you could consider your vocabulary, your audience’s potential knowledge of current natural science (or lack thereof), and what is specifically important to the This element will not necessarily be a separate slide or step in the process. In your notes that address the previous six prompts, note word choices or pieces that are specifically
tailored for your audience.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: The draft of your speaker notes can be bullet points or paragraphs related to each item on the slides. Submissions should be 2–4 pages, double spaced, with 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. You should use current APA guidelines (or another format approved by your instructor) for any references. For your final project, please keep in mind that these speaker notes will accompany 5–7 slides.
| Critical Elements |
Proficient (100%) |
Needs Improvement (75%) |
Not Evident (0%) |
Value |
| Scientific Background |
Provides brief overview of scientific background of issue and question, and explains how issue relates to natural
sciences |
Provides brief overview of scientific background of issue and question, and explains how issue relates to natural
sciences, but with gaps in detail or clarity |
Does not provide brief overview of scientific background of issue and question, and does not explain how
issue relates to natural sciences |
15.8 |
| Critical Elements |
Proficient (100%) |
Needs Improvement (75%) |
Not Evident (0%) |
Value |
| Audience |
Explains how issue impacts audience, supporting response with examples from research investigation |
Explains how issue impacts audience but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support |
Does not explain how issue impacts audience |
15.8 |
| Empirical Evidence |
Describes empirical evidence that supports conclusions about impact of issues on self and audience, supporting response with examples from research
investigation |
Describes empirical evidence that supports conclusions about impact of issues on self and audience, but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support |
Does not describe empirical evidence that supports conclusions about impact of issues on self and audience |
15.8 |
| Personally |
Explains why issue is important personally |
Explains why issue is important personally but with gaps in clarity or detail |
Does not explain why issue is important personally |
15.8 |
| Investigation |
Illustrates how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue, supporting response with examples
from research investigation |
Illustrates how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support |
Does not illustrate how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue |
15.8 |
| Message |
Communicates message effectively in a way that is tailored to specific audience |
Communicates message to audience, but communication is not effective or is not
tailored to specific audience |
Does not communicate message to audience |
15.8 |
| Articulation of Response |
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization |
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact
readability and articulation of main ideas |
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding
of ideas |
5.2 |
| Total |
100% |
Related; CYB 220 Project Three Milestone Guidelines and Rubric
Order This Paper
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.