[BUY] BUSI 830 Case Study Methodology Assignment

$ 105.44

BUSI 830 Case Study Methodology Assignment Instructions

Overview

Researchers describe the background of the problem to define the root problem and explain the organizational consequences – this is where you will ‘well-define’ your case study. The problem statement is a foundational component of the research study. In this assignment, you will begin to craft a single case study scenario by scoping the root problem. Then, you will research the root problem in the literature to determine how it starts and the broad organizational consequences that result before developing a researchable problem statement. Once the problem statement is written, an applicable research question (RQ) is created. RQs are exploratory, not assumptive, and not specific to an organization. The background of the problem, problem statement, and RQs must be in alignment to ensure a reliable study will occur. If there could be any question, this assignment is about focusing your case study in preparation for your advanced doctoral research project (ADRP). Biblical integration is NOT required in this assignment.

Order Now
Order This Paper

BUSI 830 Case Study Methodology Assignment Instructions

Overview

Researchers describe the background of the problem to define the root problem and explain the organizational consequences – this is where you will ‘well-define’ your case study. The problem statement is a foundational component of the research study. In this assignment, you will begin to craft a single case study scenario by scoping the root problem. Then, you will research the root problem in the literature to determine how it starts and the broad organizational consequences that result before developing a researchable problem statement. Once the problem statement is written, an applicable research question (RQ) is created. RQs are exploratory, not assumptive, and not specific to an organization. The background of the problem, problem statement, and RQs must be in alignment to ensure a reliable study will occur. If there could be any question, this assignment is about focusing your case study in preparation for your advanced doctoral research project (ADRP). Biblical integration is NOT required in this assignment.

Instructions

After reviewing the required material stated in this week’s module, address the following in a written paper using the current APA format:

  • Choose a business problem that is related to your degree cognate for your ADRP.
  • Research the literature to understand the problem.
  • Write a one to two-page background of the problem, discussing how the problem started (i.e., root problem) and why the problem needs to be studied (i.e., organizational consequences.
  • Clearly enunciate the study purpose
  • Create a problem statement and ensure it includes:
    • A general problem sentence.
    • Three supporting sentences showing that the problem currently exists. Each supporting sentence must be supported with a different peer-reviewed scholarly source no older than five (5) years.
    • A specific problem sentence that includes the location of the study and organization type (using Moore’s (2022) template).
  • Provide a research question that aligns with the problem statement, ensuring it is exploratory, not assumptive, and not specific to an organization. For your ADRP, you may have 3 subordinate RQs, so, if desired, you may include those herein as well.
  • Provide the broad strokes of your intended case protocol (prima facie question, propositions, tentative outline), case study methodology (case type[explanatory, exploratory, descriptive], design[holistic, embedded, single, multiple]), data collection. As the case study will not be developed beyond the literature review, limit this section to about 300 words.

Required Format

Cover Page

Abstract

Introduction (remember, we don’t use this word, but the intro is the text after the title up to the first L1 heading)

Background of the Problem

Case Study Purpose

Problem Statement

Research Question(s)

Protocol, Methodology, Data Collection

Conclusion

References

Additional Requirements

Use the provided Case Study Methodology Assignment Template.

This 1000 minimum, 1500 maximum word paper needs to be written to include these guidelines:

  • The required title, abstract, running head, and reference pages are not included in the required assignment word count but are required as part of your paper.
  • Materials submitted to fulfill requirements in one course may not be submitted in another course. Concerns about the propriety of obtaining outside assistance and acknowledging sources should be addressed to the instructor of the course before the work commences and as necessary as the work proceeds.
  • This paper must include at least seven references from peer-reviewed scholarly articles that have publication dates no older than 5 years. Do not use any books.
  • All parts of the assignment must be based on peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
  • In-text citations are required to support your (a) statements, (b) points, (c) assertions, (d) issues, (e) arguments, (f) concerns, (g) paragraph topic sentences, and (h) statements of fact and opinion. Refer to Section 8.1, Appropriate Level of Citation on pages 253 and 254 in the APA Manual (7th ed.).
  • Do not provide any personal opinions.
  • Refrain from using phrases such as, “in this paper.”
  • Sources of information from Wikipedia, dictionaries, websites, blogs, and encyclopedias will not be accepted.
  • A paragraph is defined in this course as being at least 4 sentences in length and structured in a cohesive manner. Consider using the MEAL approach for writing paragraphs:
    • M – Main topic using peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
    • E – Evidence to support the main topic using peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
    • A – Analysis (e.g., for and against) of the evidence using peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
    • L – Lead back to the main topic or to the main topic in the next paragraph using peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
  • Avoid (a) clichés, (b) slang, (c) jargon, (d) exaggerations, (e) abbreviations, (f) figurative language, and (g) language that is too informal and too subjective.
  • Submit your final document for grading with file name syntax: LastNameFirstInitial Assignment Name #. For example: SmithJ_Assignment Name.doc (no .pdfs)

Grading Metrics

Consult the accompanying rubric for how

Note: Full answer to this question is available after purchase.
this assignment will be graded. Also, any form of plagiarism, including copying and pasting, will result in zero points for the entire assignment. All quoted materials must be properly cited in the current APA format.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Grading Rubric

Overview of Case Study Types
Criteria Ratings Pts
Background of the problem 10 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

A one to two-page background of the problem is clearly defined and the how and why the problem is present. Flow is logical.

8 to >6.0 pts

Proficient

There is less than one page or more than two pages of background of the problem discussing how and why the problem is present. The background of the problem is not fully defined. Flow is mostly logical.

5 to 0.0 pts

Developing

The background of the problem is clearly defined and the how and why is not discussed. The flow is not logical.

0 pts

Not present

 

10 pts
Problem Statement – general problem sentence 15 to >12.0 pts
Advanced
A general problem sentence is present, states a business problem, and includes organizational consequences. Flow is logical.
11 to >8.0 pts

Proficient

A general problem sentence is present, somewhat states a business problem, and somewhat includes organizational consequences. Flow is mostly logical.

7 to 0.0 pts

Developing

A general problem sentence is present but does not state a business problem, and/or does not include organizational consequences Flow is not logical.

0 pts

Not present

 

15 pts
Problem Statement – three to four supporting sentences. 15 to >12.0 pts

Advanced

Three supporting sentences are present and show the problem is currently happening. A different scholarly source dated within five years is provided for each supporting sentence. Flow is logical.

11 to >8.0 pts

Proficient

Two supporting sentences are present, and/or supporting sentences do not show the problem is currently happening. Scholarly sources are not dated within five years and are not different for each supporting sentence. Flow is mostly logical.

7 to 0.0 pts

Developing

One supporting sentence is present and/or does not show the problem is currently happening. Scholarly sources are not provided. Flow is not logical.

0 pts

Not present

 

15 pts
Problem Statement – specific problem sentence. 15 to >12.0 pts

Advanced

A specific problem sentence is present, aligns with the general problem sentences, and includes the study location and industry type. Flow is logical.

11 to >8.0 pts

Proficient

A specific problem sentence is present, somewhat aligns with the general problem sentences, and /or does not include the study location and/or the industry type. Flow is mostly logical.

7 to 0.0 pts

Developing

The specific problem sentence is present but does not align with the general problem sentence and does not include the location of the study or the industry type. Flow is not logical.

0 pts

Not present

 

15 pts
Research Questions (RQs) 15 to >12.0 pts

Advanced

Four RQs are present that are exploratory, not assumptive, and not specific to an organization are present and align with the problem statement. RQs are logical.

11 to >8.0 pts

Proficient

Three RQs are present that are mostly exploratory, not assumptive, and not specific to an organization are present and somewhat align with the problem statement. RQs are somewhat logical

7 to 0.0 pts

Developing

One to two RQs are present, which are not exploratory and mainly assumptive, specific to an organization are present, and do not align with the problem statement. RQs are not logical

0 pts

Not present

 

15 pts
Sources 7.5 to >6.5 pts

Advanced

Seven or more peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided.

6 to >4.0 pts

Proficient

Five to six peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided.

3 to 0.0 pts

Developing

One to four peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. Non-peer-reviewed sources are provided.

0 pts

Not present

 

7.5 pts
APA Format and  Structure, References, and Citations 7.5 to >6.5 pts

Advanced

APA formatting and structure are followed, all references and citations correspond to each other and are formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, and all assertions are supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources.

6 to >4.0 pts

Proficient

APA formatting and structure are mostly followed, most references and citations correspond to each other and are formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, and most assertions are supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources.

3 to 0.0 pts

Developing

APA formatting and structure are not followed, most references and citations do not correspond to each other and/or are not formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, and most assertions are not supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources.

0 pts

Not present

 

7.5 pts
Total Points 85 pts

Related; BUSI 830 Data Gathering Tools and Analysis Techniques Assignment Instructions

Order This Paper

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “[BUY] BUSI 830 Case Study Methodology Assignment”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!