QSO 435 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
Using the scenario organization you selected for Milestone One, you will now develop an Approach Selection decision paper. The decision paper will be targeted for the senior program manager in the Program Management Office (PMO) of your scenario organization. The decision paper will build upon the information paper you developed for Milestone One in Module Two. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
- Analyze alternatives of various project management (PM) approaches.
- Provide a project management approach selection with explanation and defense of
- Provide an approach analysis with detailed
Guidelines for Submission: Your Milestone Two submission, Approach Selection decision paper, must be 1–2 pages in length (plus a cover page and references) and must be written in APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Include at least three references cited in APA format.
| Critical Elements | Exemplary (100%) | Proficient (85%) | Needs Improvement (55%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
| PM Approaches | Meets “Proficient” criteria, and submission is well organized and detailed to a level that shows keen insight into the nuances, risks, and benefits | Compares and contrasts various types of project management approaches; addresses situation described in the information paper from Milestone One | Reviews various types of project management approaches, but does not address situation described in the information paper from Milestone One | Does not review types of project management approaches, or does not build on information paper from Milestone One | 30 |
| Approach Selection | Meets “Proficient” criteria, and defense is well organized and detailed to a level that shows keen insight into
Note: Full answer to this question is available after purchase.
|
Selects a PM approach type that is comprehensively defended based on specific references to the previous analysis and includes necessary detail | Selects a PM approach and defends the approach, but does not make specific references to previous analysis, or lacks necessary detail | Does not select and defend a PM approach type | 30 |
| Approach Analysis | Meets “Proficient” criteria, and analysis professionally details the key principles of the selected PM approach and explains why the approach was selected, with detailed examples | Analyzes the key principles behind the selected PM approach and explains why the approach was selected, with detailed examples | Analyzes the key principles behind the selected PM approach and explains why the approach was selected, but does not provide detailed examples or misses key elements | Does not analyze the key principles of the selected PM approach and does not explain why the approach was selected, or does not select a PM approach | 30 |
| Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format | Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization | Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas | Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas | 10 |
| Earned Total | 100% | ||||
QSO 435 3-2 Short Paper: Agile | QSO 435 Module Three Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric.
Order This Paper
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.